Brownfields Reauthorization Act of 2025
Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.
Would reauthorize the EPA's Brownfields Program through FY2030, doubling the maximum remediation grant per site to $1 million, cutting cost-sharing requirements in half, and waiving them entirely for small or disadvantaged communities.
The bill would also expand grant eligibility to chambers of commerce and Alaska Native corporations, remove the cap on using grant funds for administrative costs, and require the EPA to streamline its application process — changes aimed at making the program more accessible to underserved areas.
What this bill would do
What it would do
The bill would reauthorize the EPA's Brownfields Program — which funds assessment, cleanup, and reuse of contaminated properties — through fiscal year 2030. It would raise the maximum grant for each remediation site from $500,000 to $1 million, reduce the cost-sharing requirement for recipients from 20% to 10%, and require the EPA to waive cost-sharing entirely for recipients in small communities or disadvantaged areas. It would expand eligibility to 501(c)(6) nonprofit organizations such as chambers of commerce and to Alaska Native Regional and Village Corporations, and would remove the existing 5% cap on using grant funds for administrative costs. Grant ranking criteria would be updated to reward applicants with a plan for meaningful local community engagement.
The bill would also authorize states and tribes to use grants for implementing — not just establishing or enhancing — state response programs, with annual funding rising from $50 million in FY2025 to $75 million in FY2030. The EPA would be required to report to Congress within one year on shortcomings in the application process and update guidance to reduce complexity for small and disadvantaged communities.
Key provisions
- 1Would double the maximum EPA grant for brownfield remediation from $500,000 to $1,000,000 per site.
- 2Would reduce the cost-sharing requirement for grant recipients from 20% to 10%, and require EPA to waive it entirely for recipients in small communities or disadvantaged areas.
- 3Would expand brownfields grant eligibility to 501(c)(6) nonprofits such as chambers of commerce and to Alaska Native Regional and Village Corporations.
- 4Would remove the existing 5% cap on the share of grant funds a recipient may use for administrative costs.
- 5Would update grant ranking criteria to require consideration of whether applicants have a plan to engage and involve diverse local groups representing the affected community.
- 6Would authorize states and tribes to use grants to implement state response programs, and would authorize $50 million to $75 million annually for those programs through FY2030.
- 7Would require the EPA to submit a report to Congress and update application guidance within one year of enactment to streamline the process for small and disadvantaged communities.
Who would be affected
State and local governments, Indian tribes, Alaska Native Regional and Village Corporations, 501(c)(6) nonprofits such as chambers of commerce, and small or economically disadvantaged communities that apply for EPA brownfields assessment and cleanup grants. Property owners, developers, and residents near contaminated brownfield sites seeking redevelopment would also be affected by how quickly and thoroughly cleanups proceed.
Why it matters
Communities that have struggled to qualify for or fully fund brownfields cleanups — due to high cost-sharing obligations, a low per-site grant ceiling, or complex applications — would gain expanded access under the bill. Waiving cost-sharing for disadvantaged areas and raising the grant cap could allow more sites to reach full remediation. Alaska Native communities previously excluded from certain eligibility categories would gain new access to program resources.
What would change
Changes to existing law
Amends Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), Section 104(k) (Sec. 2, Sec. 3)
Expands eligibility, raises per-site grant cap to $1 million, removes admin-cost cap, cuts cost-sharing to 10%, waives cost-sharing for disadvantaged areas, updates ranking criteria, and reauthorizes through FY2030.
Amends Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), Section 128(a) (Sec. 4)
Adds 'implement' to allowed uses of state response program grants and replaces prior appropriations authorization with new annual amounts of $50 million to $75 million for FY2025–FY2030.
Agencies directed to act
Effective dates
- EPA report to Congress on application ranking criteria and approval process
- EPA guidance update on application ranking and approval process
- State response program funding authorization period
Funding and costs
- $1,000,000
Maximum EPA grant per brownfield remediation site
- $50,000,000
State and tribal brownfields response programs
- $55,000,000
State and tribal brownfields response programs
- $60,000,000
State and tribal brownfields response programs
- $65,000,000
State and tribal brownfields response programs
- $70,000,000
State and tribal brownfields response programs
- $75,000,000
State and tribal brownfields response programs
Congressional Budget Office estimate
CBO estimates that implementing S. 347 would cost $1.2 billion over the 2025–2030 period and $379 million after 2030, all in discretionary spending subject to appropriation, with no effect on the deficit.
S. 347 would reauthorize and modify two EPA grant programs for cleaning up brownfields — contaminated properties that must be remediated before redevelopment. CBO estimates it would cost $1.2 billion over the 2025–2030 period and an additional $379 million after 2030 in spending subject to appropriation (i.e., discretionary funds Congress must separately approve each year). The bill has no effect on direct (mandatory) spending, revenues, or the deficit. CBO identified no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates in the bill.
How implementation would work
The EPA would apply the revised eligibility rules, grant caps, cost-sharing requirements, and updated ranking criteria to new and ongoing grant cycles under CERCLA Section 104(k). The agency would be required to submit a report to Congress within one year of enactment evaluating application shortcomings, common point-deduction sources, and strategies to reach small and disadvantaged communities, along with any recommended legislative changes. The EPA must also update its application guidance within one year to reduce complexity while preserving competitive integrity. State and tribal grantees implementing response programs would operate under the expanded authorization, subject to annual appropriations through FY2030.
Legislative status & sources
Latest action
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 6.
Official CRS summary
Show the CRS summaryHide the CRS summary
This bill extends through FY2030 and modifies the Brownfields Program under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). The Brownfields Program is administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to provide grants and technical assistance to states, communities, tribes, and other entities to assess, clean up, and reuse contaminated properties.
First, the bill expands eligibility for Brownfields Program resources to tax-exempt organizations defined under section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code, which are organizations that are not organized for profit and do not provide net earnings to private shareholders or individuals (e.g., chambers of commerce).
Additionally, the bill
- increases to $1 million the maximum grant amount that the EPA may provide for brownfield remediation per site,
- removes the 5% cap that a grant recipient may use for administrative costs,
- reduces the cost-sharing requirement for grant recipients from 20% to 10%,
- requires the EPA to waive cost-sharing requirements for grant recipients located in small communities or disadvantaged areas,
- authorizes the use of grants by a state or Indian tribe for the implementation of a response program,
- modifies the criteria used to rank grant applications by requiring the consideration of whether the applicant has a plan to engage a diverse set of local groups and organizations that represent the views of the local community directly affected by the proposed brownfield project, and
- requires the EPA to report on and update application ranking criteria and the approval process.
Legislative subjects
Alaska Natives and Hawaiians; Congressional oversight; Environmental Protection; Hazardous wastes and toxic substances; Indian lands and resources rights; Land use and conservation; Rural conditions and development; State and local government operations