S 278 · 119th Congress

Newsworthy

Kids Off Social Media Act

children's online safetysocial mediaschool internet accessalgorithmic recommendationsonline privacy
Share

Last action 2025-06-30

Sponsored by Sen. Schatz, Brian [D-HI] (D) — HI

Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.

Would prohibit social media platforms from allowing children under 13 to create or maintain accounts and would ban platforms from using personalized recommendation systems — algorithmically curated feeds — for users under 17, with the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general authorized to enforce both requirements.

Would also require schools that receive federally subsidized internet access through the E-Rate program to block student access to social media on school-supported devices and networks, making that block a condition of continued eligibility for the discount program.

What this bill would do

What it would do

The bill would prohibit social media platforms from knowingly allowing children under 13 to create or keep accounts, and would require platforms to terminate existing child accounts and delete the associated personal data. Users whose accounts are terminated would have 90 days to request a portable copy of their data. The bill would also prohibit platforms from using personalized recommendation systems — automated tools that suggest or rank content based on a user's personal data — for any user the platform knows is under 17. A narrow exception permits recommendations based only on device type, language, approximate location, and age.

The bill would not require platforms to implement age-verification technology or affirmatively collect age data they do not already gather; enforcement turns on whether a platform had "knowledge fairly implied on the basis of objective circumstances." Schools receiving E-Rate discounted telecommunications services would be required to certify that they monitor student activity and use filtering technology to block social media on supported networks and devices. Schools that fail to make a good-faith compliance effort would have to reimburse E-Rate support received during the noncompliant period.

Key provisions

  1. 1Would prohibit social media platforms from allowing children under 13 to create or keep accounts, and would require immediate termination of known child accounts and deletion of their personal data.Sec. 103
  2. 2Would ban platforms from using personalized recommendation systems — algorithmic content feeds based on personal data — for any user the platform knows is under 17, with limited exceptions for device type, language, location, and age.Sec. 104
  3. 3Would establish that platforms need not implement age-verification technology or collect new age data, but can be held to an 'objective circumstances' knowledge standard for enforcement purposes.Sec. 105
  4. 4Would authorize FTC enforcement and allow state attorneys general to bring civil actions for damages, restitution, and injunctions on behalf of state residents affected by platform violations.Sec. 106
  5. 5Would require schools receiving E-Rate broadband subsidies to certify they block student access to social media on supported devices and networks, and would require reimbursement of E-Rate funds for noncompliant periods.Sec. 202
  6. 6Would require schools to submit copies of their internet safety policies to the FCC, which must create and maintain a publicly accessible database of those policies.Sec. 203

Who would be affected

Social media platforms that are directed to consumers, derive revenue primarily from advertising or data sales, and function primarily as forums for user-generated content. Elementary and secondary schools that participate in the federal E-Rate program for discounted internet and telecommunications services. Children under 13 who currently hold platform accounts, and teenagers aged 13–16 who use algorithmically curated feeds. State attorneys general, the FTC, and the FCC are each assigned enforcement or administrative duties.

Why it matters

Platforms that knowingly allow underage accounts or serve personalized feeds to teens would face FTC enforcement and civil suits by state attorneys general, including damages and injunctive relief. Schools that do not deploy blocking technology risk losing E-Rate discounts they rely on to fund broadband access. Teens aged 13–16 would see chronological rather than algorithmically personalized feeds, directly changing how content reaches them on covered platforms.

What would change

Changes to existing law

Amends Children's Internet Protection Act (Section 1721 of Public Law 106-554) (Sec. 202)

Adds a new subsection requiring E-Rate-eligible schools to block student access to social media platforms on supported services, devices, and networks as a condition of receiving discounted rates.

Amends Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) (Sec. 203)

Requires schools to submit copies of their internet safety policies to the FCC as part of E-Rate applications and directs the FCC to publish those policies in a public database.

Agencies directed to act

Federal Trade CommissionFederal Communications Commission

Effective dates

  • All Title I platform requirements (child account ban, personalized-feed ban)Sec. 108Within 1 year of enactment
  • FCC must amend its rules to carry out the school social-media blocking requirementsSec. 202Within 120 days of enactment
  • Schools with existing filtering measures must submit first E-Rate compliance certificationSec. 202Within 120 days of the start of the first E-Rate program year after enactment
  • Schools without filtering measures must achieve full compliance and certifySec. 202Second E-Rate program year after enactment

Funding and costs

Congressional Budget Office estimate

CBO estimates enacting the Kids Off Social Media Act would cost $4 million in discretionary spending over the 2025–2030 period, with negligible effects on direct spending, revenues, and the deficit over 2025–2035.

CBO estimates that S. 278 would increase spending subject to appropriation (meaning funds Congress must separately approve each year) by $4 million over the 2025–2030 period, primarily to hire additional lawyers and technologists at the Federal Trade Commission to enforce the bill's new requirements; costs beyond 2030 were not estimated. Effects on direct (mandatory) spending and revenues would each be less than $500,000 over the 2025–2035 period, yielding a negligible net effect on the deficit. The bill contains both intergovernmental and private-sector mandates, but CBO estimates the costs of those mandates would fall below the statutory thresholds set by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act ($103 million and $206 million, respectively, in 2025).

View the full CBO cost estimate

How implementation would work

The FTC would enforce Title I's platform requirements by treating violations as unfair or deceptive acts under the FTC Act; state attorneys general may bring parallel civil actions with prior notice to the FTC. Title I takes effect one year after enactment, giving platforms a compliance window. For schools, the FCC must amend its E-Rate rules within 120 days of enactment. Schools with filtering measures already in place must certify compliance in the first E-Rate program year after enactment; schools without such measures have until the second program year to come into full compliance, with a waiver available if state procurement rules prevent timely action. The FCC would also maintain a publicly accessible database of school internet safety policies submitted as part of E-Rate applications.

Legislative status & sources

Latest action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 108.

2025-06-30

Official CRS summary

Show the CRS summary

This bill limits children’s access to social media platforms and requires both platforms and schools to implement certain restrictions on children’s social media usage.

Specifically, the bill prohibits social media platforms from knowingly allowing children under the age of 13 to create or maintain accounts. Platforms must delete existing accounts held by children and any personal data collected from child users. Platforms are also generally prohibited from using automated systems to suggest or promote content based on personal data collected from users under the age of 17. The bill directs the Federal Trade Commission to enforce these provisions. States may also bring civil actions against platforms whose violations of these provisions have adversely affected their residents.

Further, as a condition of receiving discounted telecommunications service under the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support (E-Rate) program, schools must enforce policies preventing the use of E-Rate-supported services, networks, and devices to access social media, and must use blocking or filtering technology to prevent such access. Schools that do not make a good faith effort to comply and correct known violations are required to reimburse any E-Rate support they received for the applicable period. Schools must also submit copies of their internet safety policies to the Federal Communications Commission for publication.

Under the bill, social media platforms are defined as public-facing sites that function primarily as forums for user-generated content. Some categories of online platforms are explicitly excluded, including sites that provide primarily videoconferencing, emailing, or educational services.

From the Congressional Research Service.

Legislative subjects

Business records; Child safety and welfare; Civil actions and liability; Computers and information technology; Consumer affairs; Educational facilities and institutions; Elementary and secondary education; Internet, web applications, social media; Science, Technology, Communications; State and local government operations

Committee report

S. Rept. 119-33

Congressional Bill

Ask GovernmentReporter about this bill

Ask anything about this bill. The AI can look up referenced laws and statutes to provide context.

S 278: Kids Off Social Media Act | Legislation Reporter