Foreign Robocall Elimination Act
Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.
The bill would direct the Federal Communications Commission to create an interagency taskforce studying how to combat robocalls placed into the United States from abroad, and would give legal immunity to the industry consortium that traces the calls' origins.
It would also stretch the FCC's re-application cycle for that tracing consortium from every year to every three years, and would let the FCC require some voice service providers to post a bond of up to $100,000 before registering in the agency's robocall-mitigation database.
What this bill would do
What it would do
The bill would require the FCC, after consulting the Federal Trade Commission and the Attorney General, to establish an interagency taskforce on unlawful robocalls within 270 days of enactment. The taskforce, made up of federal officials and industry and consumer representatives, would study international robocall traffic and report recommendations to Congress within 360 days of its formation, after which it would terminate. The bill would also stretch the FCC's re-application cycle for the industry consortium that traces robocall origins from annually to once every three years, grant that consortium legal immunity for receiving, sharing, or publishing trace-back data, and let the FCC or consortium publish lists of voice service providers that refuse to cooperate or that carry substantial unlawful robocall traffic. Separately, the bill would direct the FCC to issue rules requiring some voice service providers to post a bond of up to $100,000 before registering in the agency's Robocall Mitigation Database, while creating exemptions for established, regulated, or publicly traded providers. It would not itself impose criminal penalties or create new causes of action against robocallers.
Key provisions
- 1Would require the FCC to establish an interagency taskforce on unlawful robocalls within 270 days of enactment, with federal and private-sector members
- 2Would require the taskforce to study international robocall trends and report recommendations to Congress within 360 days of its formation
- 3Would change the FCC's re-application cycle for the robocall trace-back consortium designation from annual to once every three years
- 4Would grant the registered trace-back consortium immunity from lawsuits for receiving, sharing, or publishing trace-back information
- 5Would let the FCC or consortium publish lists of voice service providers that refuse to cooperate with trace-back efforts or carry substantial unlawful robocall traffic, and authorize enforcement based on that information
- 6Would direct the FCC to require certain providers to post a bond of up to $100,000 before registering in the Robocall Mitigation Database, with exemptions for established providers
Who would be affected
The Federal Communications Commission, Federal Trade Commission, and Department of Justice, which would staff and consult on the taskforce; voice service providers and analytics companies, which face potential bonding requirements and public listing; the industry-led trace-back consortium; and consumers who receive unwanted foreign robocalls.
Why it matters
Consumers could see slower but more coordinated federal action against overseas robocall operations, while voice service providers face new compliance costs, including a possible bond, and reputational risk from public listing if they don't cooperate with trace-back efforts. The trace-back consortium would gain legal protection that could encourage more aggressive information-sharing.
What would change
Changes to existing law
Amends Pallone-Thune TRACED Act, Sec. 13(d)(2) (Sec. 3)
Changes the FCC's required frequency for soliciting trace-back consortium applications from annually to once every three years
Amends Pallone-Thune TRACED Act, Sec. 13(d) (Sec. 4(a))
Adds immunity from lawsuits for the registered consortium when receiving, sharing, or publishing trace-back information
Amends Pallone-Thune TRACED Act, Sec. 13(e) (Sec. 4(b))
Rewrites the provision to let the FCC or consortium publish lists of noncooperative or high-volume unlawful-robocall providers and take enforcement action
Agencies directed to act
Effective dates
- Deadline for the FCC to establish the interagency taskforce on unlawful robocalls
- Deadline for the taskforce to submit its report to Congress after being established
- Taskforce termination after submitting its report to Congress
Funding and costs
- $100,000
Maximum bond the FCC could require certain voice service providers to post before registering in the Robocall Mitigation Database
Congressional Budget Office estimate
CBO estimates that S. 2666 would have no significant effect on the federal deficit, with any revenue changes or discretionary spending costs remaining below $500,000 over the 2026–2036 period.
CBO finds that S. 2666 would produce no change in direct (mandatory) spending and only an insignificant increase in revenues — less than $500,000 annually — over the 2026–2036 scoring window, stemming from potential bond forfeitures deposited in the Treasury. Discretionary costs for the FCC, FTC, and DOJ to implement the bill would also be insignificant; the FCC is authorized to offset its costs through fee collections, making its net cost negligible. The bill contains no intergovernmental mandates, but it does contain private-sector mandates — including a bond requirement for certain voice service providers and a limit on private legal claims against a robocall-tracing consortium — whose combined costs CBO cannot determine, leaving it unclear whether they exceed UMRA's annual threshold of $214 million (in 2026, adjusted for inflation).
How implementation would work
The FCC would consult with the FTC and Attorney General to stand up the taskforce within 270 days, appoint federal and private-sector members under specified procedures, and have the taskforce study international robocall trends before reporting to Congress within 360 days of formation; the taskforce would then dissolve 90 days later. Separately, the FCC would conduct rulemaking to define bond amounts and exemption criteria for the Robocall Mitigation Database, and would periodically re-solicit applications for the trace-back consortium designation every three years instead of annually, publishing noncompliant-provider lists as a basis for enforcement.
Legislative status & sources
Latest action
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 422.
Official CRS summary
Show the CRS summaryHide the CRS summary
This bill establishes an interagency task force on unlawful robocalls to advise federal agencies and Congress on combating robocalls made from outside of the United States.
The bill also increases the term applicable to the Federal Communications Commission’s designation of an industry-led consortium to trace the origin of suspected unlawful robocalls. Under current law, the commission must annually seek applications from industry groups to serve as the designated consortium; under the bill, the commission must seek applications once every three years.
Legislative subjects
Advisory bodies; Congressional oversight; Consumer affairs; Foreign and international corporations; Government information and archives; Government studies and investigations; Marketing and advertising; Right of privacy; Science, Technology, Communications; Telephone and wireless communication
Committee report
S. Rept. 119-122