Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025
Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.
Would direct the Commerce Department's Industry and Analysis office to monitor, map, and model critical supply chains and emerging technologies, establish a multi-agency working group, and produce a recurring national strategy to reduce U.S. vulnerabilities to supply chain disruptions.
The bill addresses long-standing concerns about American dependence on foreign sources — particularly adversary nations — for goods critical to national and economic security, and would set up a permanent coordination structure across more than a dozen federal agencies.
What this bill would do
What it would do
The bill would assign sweeping new supply chain responsibilities to the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis. Within 120 days of enactment, the Assistant Secretary would establish a Supply Chain Resilience Working Group drawing representatives from at least ten federal agencies, and designate which industries, supply chains, and goods are "critical." Within one year, the office would be required to assess, map, and model critical supply chains; identify gaps and vulnerabilities; evaluate the capacity of domestic and allied-nation manufacturers; and develop contingency plans. Within 18 months, and annually thereafter, the Assistant Secretary would submit to Congress a national strategy report covering supply chain threats, manufacturing capacity, and specific recommendations to improve resilience — especially for emerging technologies such as semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing.
The bill would not authorize any new appropriations; all activities must be carried out within existing resources. It expressly bars requiring private entities to share information or implement recommendations, and protects voluntarily submitted supply chain data from FOIA disclosure. All provisions would sunset ten years after enactment.
Key provisions
- 1Would assign the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis new responsibilities to promote supply chain resilience, assess vulnerabilities, and encourage domestic manufacturing of emerging technologies.
- 2Would require the Assistant Secretary to establish the Supply Chain Resilience Working Group — comprising representatives from at least ten federal agencies — within 120 days of enactment.
- 3Would require the Assistant Secretary, within one year, to assess, map, and model critical supply chains; identify gaps and vulnerabilities; and develop contingency plans in consultation with the Working Group and allied nations.
- 4Would require the Assistant Secretary to submit an annual national strategy report to Congress beginning 18 months after enactment, covering threats, manufacturing capacity, and recommendations to improve supply chain resilience.
- 5Would protect voluntarily submitted critical supply chain information from FOIA disclosure, civil litigation use, and state disclosure laws, provided the submitter includes an express confidentiality statement.
- 6Would require the Secretary of Commerce to produce a capability assessment identifying Commerce offices relevant to supply chain resilience and recommending coordination improvements, due within two years.
- 7Would terminate all requirements, responsibilities, and obligations under the Act ten years after enactment.
Who would be affected
The Commerce Department's Industry and Analysis office bears the primary new burden. Federal agencies on the Working Group — including the Departments of State, Defense, Homeland Security, Transportation, Energy, Agriculture, Interior, Health and Human Services, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the Small Business Administration — would contribute analysis and coordination. Domestic manufacturers, suppliers, and private entities in critical industries could voluntarily share protected supply chain data. State, local, and tribal governments and allied nations would be consulted.
Why it matters
If enacted, the U.S. government would have a formal, recurring mechanism to identify where critical goods — from semiconductors to advanced materials — are dangerously concentrated in adversary nations, and to develop strategies to diversify those sources. Manufacturers in critical sectors could share sensitive vulnerability data with Commerce without fear of public disclosure or use against them in civil litigation, potentially encouraging more candid government-industry cooperation on supply chain risk.
What would change
Changes to existing law
Creates Supply Chain Resilience Working Group (Sec. 3)
Establishes a new multi-agency working group led by the Assistant Secretary of Commerce to assess and respond to critical supply chain vulnerabilities.
Creates Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Analysis — authorities (Sec. 2)
Adds new statutory responsibilities for supply chain monitoring, resilience promotion, and manufacturing competitiveness to the Assistant Secretary's existing duties.
Agencies directed to act
Effective dates
- Working Group established and critical industry/supply chain designations made
- Supply chain assessments, mapping, and contingency planning activities completed
- Implementation report submitted to Congress
- Interagency data-sharing agreements entered
- First national strategy report on critical supply chain resiliency submitted to Congress
- Commerce Department capability assessment submitted to Congress
- All Act requirements, responsibilities, and obligations terminate
Funding and costs
Congressional Budget Office estimate
CBO estimates S. 257 would have no effect on direct spending, revenues, or the deficit, with discretionary spending (subject to appropriation) of less than $500,000 over the 2025–2030 period.
CBO estimates that S. 257 would have no effect on direct (mandatory) spending, revenues, or the federal deficit over the 2025–2035 scoring window. The bill would require the Department of Commerce to assess supply chain vulnerabilities for goods critical to national or economic security, establish an interagency working group, and submit annual reports to Congress — but CBO notes that most of these responsibilities are already being carried out by existing agencies. Any discretionary spending (funding that requires annual congressional appropriations) to prepare the required assessments and reports is estimated at less than $500,000 over the 2025–2030 period. CBO identified no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates in the bill.
How implementation would work
The Assistant Secretary of Commerce would lead implementation, first designating critical industries, goods, and supply chains within 120 days — with a public comment period. The Working Group, composed of agency representatives, would guide annual assessments and coordinate cross-agency responses. The office would enter data-sharing agreements with relevant agencies within one year. Annual strategy reports must go to six named congressional committees in unclassified form (with an optional classified annex), and may not include non-aggregated proprietary business data. Designations must be updated at least every four years. All work must be funded from existing appropriations.
Legislative status & sources
Latest action
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held.
Official CRS summary
Show the CRS summaryHide the CRS summary
This bill requires the Industry and Analysis office of the International Trade Administration of the Department of Commerce to monitor and respond to disruptions in critical industries and supply chains.
Specifically, the office must (1) establish the Supply Chain Resilience Working Group; (2) assess, map, and model critical supply chains; (3) identify high-priority supply chain gaps and vulnerabilities in critical industries; (4) identify and evaluate the effect of potential supply chain disruptions on market stability; and (5) collaborate with other governmental bodies and key international partners to identify opportunities to reduce supply chain gaps and vulnerabilities.
Additionally, the office, in consultation with the working group and specified nongovernmental entities, must make recommendations and implement a strategy to improve the security and resiliency of manufacturing capacity and supply chains for critical industries (including critical industries for emerging technologies).
The bill includes various reporting requirements.
Legislative subjects
Advanced technology and technological innovations; Commerce; Computers and information technology; Economic development; Economic performance and conditions; Intergovernmental relations; Manufacturing; Public-private cooperation; Retail and wholesale trades; Supply chain
Committee report
S. Rept. 119-16