Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4553) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 105) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 106) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan''; and for other purposes.

The resolution would allow the House to take up H.R. 4553, the fiscal year 2026 energy and water development appropriations bill, under a structured process: one hour of general debate, consideration only of amendments pre-approved by the Rules Committee (plus limited en bloc and pro forma amendments), and a single motion to recommit before final passage. It waives various procedural points of order that could otherwise block or delay consideration.

The resolution would also make it in order for the House to consider three joint resolutions disapproving Bureau of Land Management resource management plans covering the Miles City Field Office in Montana, a North Dakota field office, and the Central Yukon area in Alaska, each under one hour of debate and waived points of order. It separately adopts two earlier House resolutions and tables a third.

Members of the House of Representatives, who would operate under these debate and amendment limits; the House Appropriations Committee and Natural Resources Committee leadership, who control debate time; and indirectly, federal land users and agencies affected by the Bureau of Land Management plans up for disapproval votes.

By waiving points of order and limiting amendments, the resolution determines how much latitude members have to alter the appropriations bill and how quickly the chamber can vote on rescinding the three BLM land-use plans, shaping the outcome of votes that could affect federal energy funding and land management in Montana, North Dakota, and Alaska.