HR 5694 · 119th Congress

ARTIST Act

Alaska Native rightsmarine mammal ivorystate ivory banswildlife conservation lawIndigenous handicrafts
Share

Last action 2026-06-02

Sponsored by Rep. Begich, Nicholas J. [R-AK-At Large] (R) — AK

Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.

The ARTIST Act would amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act to bar states from banning the sale, transfer, or possession of marine mammal ivory, bone, or baleen when it has been made by an Alaska Native into authentic handicrafts or clothing.

It would also require federal regulators to base any restrictions on Alaska Native subsistence and handicraft hunting on substantial evidence, addressing longstanding disputes over state ivory bans and federal takings regulations affecting Native artisans.

What this bill would do

What it would do

The bill would rewrite the Marine Mammal Protection Act's exemption for Alaska Natives, preserving their existing right to take marine mammals for subsistence or to create authentic Alaska Native handicrafts and clothing, while adding new definitions of "marine mammal ivory" and "traditional Alaska Native handicrafts." It would newly bar any state from prohibiting the interstate commerce, importation, sale, transfer, trade, barter, or possession of marine mammal ivory, bone, or baleen that has been incorporated by an Alaska Native into an authentic handicraft or clothing article. The bill would also require the Secretary to support any depletion-related restriction on Alaska Native takings with substantial evidence, documented in writing and posted publicly, when challenged by an Alaska Native organization. It would not alter existing Indian Tribe rights or required government-to-government consultation, and it would leave the Secretary's general authority to regulate depleted species intact.

Key provisions

  1. 1Would redefine 'authentic Alaska Native article of handicrafts and clothing,' 'marine mammal ivory,' and 'traditional Alaska Native handicrafts' under the Marine Mammal Protection ActSec. 2
  2. 2Would preserve the exemption allowing Alaska Natives to take marine mammals for subsistence or for creating and selling authentic handicrafts, if not done wastefullySec. 2
  3. 3Would prohibit any state from banning the interstate commerce, sale, transfer, trade, barter, or possession of marine mammal ivory, bone, or baleen incorporated into authentic Alaska Native handicraftsSec. 2
  4. 4Would require the Secretary to support depletion-related takings regulations with substantial evidence documented in writing and posted publicly, when challenged by Alaska Native organizationsSec. 2
  5. 5Would clarify that nothing in the exemption alters existing Indian Tribe rights or required government-to-government consultationSec. 2

Who would be affected

Alaska Native artisans and hunters who produce ivory, bone, and baleen handicrafts, state governments that currently or might otherwise restrict sales of these items, retailers and buyers of Alaska Native handicrafts nationwide, and the federal agencies that regulate marine mammal takings.

Why it matters

Alaska Native artisans have faced state-level restrictions, notably ivory sale bans in some states, that complicate selling their handicrafts across state lines. The bill would preempt such state bans for authentic items and require stronger evidentiary support before federal regulators can restrict Native subsistence or handicraft hunting.

What would change

Changes to existing law

Amends Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1371(b)) (Sec. 2)

Rewrites the Alaska Native exemption to add handicraft definitions, bar state bans on Native ivory/bone/baleen handicrafts, and add a substantial-evidence requirement for takings regulations.

How implementation would work

The amended exemption would take effect upon enactment, immediately barring state prohibitions on qualifying Alaska Native marine mammal handicraft items in interstate commerce. If the Secretary later seeks to regulate takings due to a depletion finding, the bill requires notice and hearing procedures already in the Act, plus a new written, publicly posted substantial-evidence justification whenever an Alaska Native organization brings a legal challenge to such a regulation, assessment, or determination.

Legislative status & sources

Latest action

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 588.

2026-06-02

Official CRS summary

Show the CRS summary

This bill prohibits states from imposing bans on marine mammal products produced by Alaska Natives.

Specifically, states may not prohibit the importation, sale, transfer, trade, barter, or possession of marine mammal ivory, marine mammal bone, or baleen legally produced by an Alaska Native as an authentic Alaska Native article of handicrafts and clothing.

From the Congressional Research Service.

Legislative subjects

Alaska; Alaska Natives and Hawaiians; Historical and cultural resources; Mammals; Native Americans; Wildlife conservation and habitat protection

Committee report

H. Rept. 119-674

Congressional Bill

Ask GovernmentReporter about this bill

Ask anything about this bill. The AI can look up referenced laws and statutes to provide context.

HR 5694: ARTIST Act | Legislation Reporter