District of Columbia Home Rule Improvement Act of 2025
Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.
The bill would extend Congress's review period over District of Columbia laws from 30 days to a uniform 60 days, and would let Congress disapprove individual provisions of D.C. laws, D.C. executive orders, and regulations, not just entire acts.
It would also bar the D.C. Council from withdrawing legislation once submitted for review or re-passing laws substantially similar to ones Congress has already rejected, expanding federal oversight of D.C.'s home-rule government.
What this bill would do
What it would do
The bill would amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to apply a uniform 60-day congressional review period to nearly all D.C. Council legislation, replacing the current 30-day period (60 days already applies to criminal-law acts, which the bill folds into the general rule). It would let Congress disapprove not just entire D.C. acts but individual provisions within them, and would extend the same disapproval authority to Mayoral executive orders and agency regulations, which currently face no congressional review. It also sets expedited procedures for disapproval resolutions in the House and Senate.
The bill would bar the D.C. Council from withdrawing legislation once transmitted to Congress, and would prohibit the Council from re-enacting a law "substantially the same" as one Congress has already disapproved unless later specifically authorized. It would also require the D.C. Mayor and Council chair to jointly present an annual report to specified congressional committees. It does not change D.C.'s underlying legislative authority itself, only the scope and timing of congressional review.
Key provisions
- 1Would replace the current 30-day (and 60-day for criminal acts) congressional review period with a single uniform 60-day period for nearly all D.C. legislation
- 2Would clarify and standardize expedited procedures in the House and Senate for considering joint resolutions disapproving D.C. Council actions
- 3Would authorize Congress to disapprove individual provisions of a D.C. act rather than only the act in its entirety
- 4Would extend congressional review and disapproval authority to Mayoral executive orders and executive-branch regulations, with a 60-day delay before they take effect
- 5Would prohibit the D.C. Council from withdrawing an act after transmitting it to Congress for review
- 6Would bar the Council from re-transmitting legislation substantially the same as an act Congress already disapproved, absent later authorization
- 7Would require the D.C. Mayor and Council chair to appear annually before specified House and Senate committees to report on the state of the District
Who would be affected
The District of Columbia Council, the D.C. Mayor and executive-branch agencies that issue regulations, and District residents whose local laws and regulations would face a longer and broader federal review window. Congressional committees—Oversight and Government Reform in the House, and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs in the Senate—would gain new oversight duties.
Why it matters
D.C. laws and regulations would take longer to go into effect and could be blocked piece by piece rather than only as whole acts, giving Congress finer-grained control over local D.C. governance. The Council would lose flexibility to withdraw or revise disapproved measures, and Mayoral executive orders and regulations—currently not reviewed by Congress at all—would become subject to possible congressional veto.
What would change
Changes to existing law
Amends District of Columbia Home Rule Act, Section 602(c) (Sec. 2)
Replaces the 30-day (and separate 60-day criminal-law) congressional review periods with a single uniform 60-day period for D.C. acts
Amends District of Columbia Home Rule Act, Section 412(a) (Sec. 2)
Makes the Council's emergency-legislation authority subject to the new rule barring exemption for extensions of emergency acts
Amends District of Columbia Home Rule Act, Section 604 (Sec. 3)
Rewrites expedited House and Senate procedures for considering resolutions disapproving D.C. actions, executive orders, and regulations
Amends District of Columbia Home Rule Act, Section 602(c)(1) (Sec. 4)
Allows disapproval resolutions to target individual provisions of a D.C. act, not just the whole act
Creates District of Columbia Home Rule Act, Title VI (Sec. 5)
Adds new Section 605 establishing congressional transmission, review, and disapproval authority over Mayoral executive orders and regulations
Amends District of Columbia Home Rule Act, Section 602 (Secs. 6, 7)
Adds new subsections barring withdrawal of transmitted acts and re-transmission of acts substantially similar to disapproved ones
Agencies directed to act
Effective dates
- The Act's amendments generally apply to D.C. acts, executive orders, and regulations transmitted to Congress
- The prohibition on transmitting acts substantially similar to disapproved acts
Funding and costs
Congressional Budget Office estimate
CBO estimates the cost of implementing H.R. 5183 would be insignificant over the 2026–2030 period.
CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 5183 would have an insignificant budgetary cost over the 2026–2030 period, based on the cost of similar Congressional review activities. The bill would amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to establish a uniform 60-day Congressional review period for all D.C. legislation, regulations, and executive actions; create a line-item veto during that review period; and restrict the D.C. Council from extending emergency laws, withdrawing legislation from Congressional review, or passing laws substantially similar to ones Congress has disapproved. CBO did not identify any intergovernmental or private-sector mandates exceeding statutory thresholds.
How implementation would work
The D.C. Council would continue transmitting enacted legislation to the Speaker of the House and President of the Senate, but now under a 60-day review clock; the Mayor would newly have to transmit executive orders and regulations for the same review. Congressional committees (Oversight and Government Reform in the House, Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs in the Senate) would receive referred disapproval resolutions and follow the bill's expedited discharge, debate-limit, and floor-vote procedures. If a joint resolution of disapproval becomes law, it repeals the targeted D.C. act, provision, executive order, or regulation as of that date. The Mayor and Council chair would separately appear annually before both committees to report on D.C.'s condition.
Legislative status & sources
Latest action
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 396.
Official CRS summary
Show the CRS summaryHide the CRS summary
This bill establishes a uniform 60-day period of congressional review for all nonemergency legislation enacted by the District of Columbia (DC). It also authorizes congressional disapproval of DC regulations and other executive actions, specific provisions in legislation, and extensions of emergency legislation.
Currently, DC legislation is generally subject to a 30-day period of congressional review during which time Congress may enact a joint resolution of disapproval to nullify the legislation. Legislation involving criminal law is subject to a 60-day period of congressional review. Emergency legislation is not subject to congressional review.
The bill applies a 60-day period of congressional review to all DC legislation other than emergency legislation. It also authorizes Congress to nullify (1) extensions of emergency DC legislation, and (2) one or more discrete provisions in DC legislation. The bill prohibits the DC Council from withdrawing legislation that it has transmitted to Congress for review or enacting legislation that is substantially the same as legislation that Congress disapproved.
The bill also establishes a 60-day period of congressional review for DC executive orders and regulations according to procedures comparable to those for legislation.
The bill additionally specifies the procedures for expedited consideration of joint resolutions of disapproval for DC legislation in each chamber, particularly the Senate.
Finally, the bill requires the DC Mayor and the chair of the DC Council to present a report on DC to specified congressional committees at least once every calendar year.
Legislative subjects
Administrative law and regulatory procedures; Congressional oversight; District of Columbia; Government Operations and Politics; Government information and archives; House of Representatives; Intergovernmental relations; Legislative rules and procedure; Senate; State and local government operations
Committee report
H. Rept. 119-463