HR 421 · 119th Congress

Newsworthy

Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act

small business regulationfederal rulemakingregulatory reformadministrative proceduresmall business compliance
Share

Last action 2025-06-10

Sponsored by Rep. Cline, Ben [R-VA-6] (R) — VA

Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.

Would substantially strengthen the Regulatory Flexibility Act by requiring federal agencies to analyze both direct and indirect economic effects of proposed rules on small businesses, extend those requirements to land management plans and tribal organizations, and eliminate agencies' authority to waive required economic analyses.

Would also empower the Small Business Administration's Chief Counsel for Advocacy to issue binding compliance rules, make it easier for small entities to challenge non-compliant rules in court, and waive first-time civil fines for small businesses that commit paperwork errors.

What this bill would do

What it would do

The bill would make wide-ranging amendments to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, requiring federal agencies to analyze both direct and indirect economic effects of proposed rules on small businesses — including effects on entities not directly regulated. It would expand the Act's coverage to land management plan revisions (covering Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management plans), tribal organizations, and rules involving tax recordkeeping requirements. Agencies would no longer be allowed to waive required economic analyses. Instead, the SBA's Chief Counsel for Advocacy would issue binding compliance rules and convene pre-publication review panels for major rules. More detailed analyses would be required, including descriptions of disproportionate impacts and effects on access to credit.

The bill would strengthen judicial review by making it available upon publication of a final rule rather than only after final agency action, and would give the Court of Appeals original jurisdiction over Chief Counsel compliance rules. It would waive first-time civil fines for small businesses committing paperwork violations, with exceptions for public health risks, criminal activity, and uncorrected violations. It would also direct the GAO to assess whether the Chief Counsel has sufficient resources for the expanded role.

Key provisions

  1. 1Would expand the definition of 'economic impact' to include reasonably foreseeable indirect effects on small entities, even those not directly regulated by the rule.Sec. 2(b)
  2. 2Would require regulatory flexibility analyses for revisions and amendments to federal land management plans issued by the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management.Sec. 2(e)
  3. 3Would remove agencies' authority to waive regulatory flexibility analysis requirements and direct the Chief Counsel for Advocacy to issue binding compliance rules within 270 days of enactment.Sec. 5
  4. 4Would require agencies to notify the Chief Counsel before publishing major rules and convene a three-member review panel to assess small business impacts within 60 days.Sec. 6
  5. 5Would require each agency to publish a periodic review plan for rules with significant small business impact within 180 days and submit annual reports to Congress.Sec. 7
  6. 6Would make judicial review of Regulatory Flexibility Act compliance available upon publication of a final rule, rather than only after final agency action.Sec. 8
  7. 7Would prohibit civil fines against small businesses for first-time paperwork violations, with exceptions for public health risks, criminal activity, tax law violations, and uncorrected violations.Sec. 14

Who would be affected

Small businesses, small nonprofits, small governmental jurisdictions, and tribal organizations subject to federal rulemaking across all sectors. Federal agencies conducting rulemaking, particularly the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management for land management plans. The SBA's Office of Advocacy gains significant new enforcement duties, and OIRA at OMB is drawn into the pre-publication review panel process.

Why it matters

If enacted, agencies would face stronger, legally enforceable obligations to minimize regulatory burdens on small businesses, and small entities would gain new tools to challenge non-compliant rules in court sooner. The elimination of the waiver authority removes a significant loophole agencies have used to avoid analyses. The first-time paperwork fine waiver would directly reduce financial penalties on small firms caught in inadvertent compliance errors.

What would change

Changes to existing law

Amends Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) (Sec. 2–8)

Expands coverage to indirect effects, land management plans, and tribal organizations; eliminates waiver authority; strengthens analysis requirements; broadens judicial review.

Amends Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 601 note) (Sec. 12)

Revises requirements for agency preparation of plain-language compliance guides for small entities, requiring input from affected small businesses.

Amends Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632) (Sec. 10)

Grants the Chief Counsel for Advocacy authority to specify small business size standards for non-SBA purposes and to approve agency-defined size standards.

Amends Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3506) (Sec. 14)

Adds a provision prohibiting agencies from imposing first-time civil fines on small businesses for paperwork violations, with defined exceptions.

Amends 28 U.S.C. § 2342 (Sec. 9)

Adds Court of Appeals original jurisdiction over all final rules issued by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy under the RFA compliance framework.

Agencies directed to act

Small Business Administration, Office of AdvocacyOffice of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and BudgetGovernment Accountability OfficeDepartment of Agriculture (Forest Service)Department of the Interior (Bureau of Land Management)

Effective dates

  • GAO report on Chief Counsel capacity and resourcesSec. 13Within 90 days of enactment
  • Agency periodic review plans for existing rules published in Federal RegisterSec. 7Within 180 days of enactment
  • Chief Counsel for Advocacy compliance rules issuedSec. 5Within 270 days of enactment
  • Review of all existing rules by agencies under published plansSec. 7Within 10 years of plan publication

How implementation would work

The Chief Counsel for Advocacy would issue binding compliance rules governing all agencies within 270 days of enactment. Before publishing a major rule, agencies would notify the Chief Counsel, triggering a 15-day window to convene a review panel (comprising SBA, the agency, and OIRA) and a 60-day window to produce a report that becomes part of the rulemaking record. Each agency would publish a periodic review plan for existing rules within 180 days of enactment and submit annual reports to Congress, the Chief Counsel, and OIRA. Small entities could request copies of review reports. A GAO study on Chief Counsel capacity would be due within 90 days of enactment.

Legislative status & sources

Latest action

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 13 - 12.

2025-06-10

Official CRS summary

Show the CRS summary

This bill modifies the rulemaking requirements and procedures of federal agencies under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 and the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, including how agencies consider economic impact with respect to small entities.

Specifically, the bill requires agencies to consider the direct, and the reasonably foreseeable indirect, economic effect of a rule on small entities when determining whether a rule is likely to have a significant economic impact. Further, the regulatory flexibility analysis for rules with a significant economic impact must include a detailed description of alternatives to a proposed rule that minimize any adverse significant economic impact or maximize any beneficial significant economic impact on small entities. The bill also expands the types of agency actions (e.g., revisions to land management plans) that are subject to a regulatory impact analysis.

The bill removes the authority for an agency to waive the regulatory flexibility analysis requirements and requires the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration to issue rules for compliance with such requirements.

The bill also modifies the procedures for the (1) gathering of comments for a proposed rule, (2) periodic review of agency rules, and (3) judicial review of final rules.

From the Congressional Research Service.

Legislative subjects

Administrative law and regulatory procedures; Administrative remedies; Business records; Civil actions and liability; Competitiveness, trade promotion, trade deficits; Congressional oversight; Economic performance and conditions; Federal appellate courts; Federal-Indian relations; Forests, forestry, trees; Government Operations and Politics; Government information and archives; Government studies and investigations; Industrial policy and productivity; Judicial review and appeals; Jurisdiction and venue; Land use and conservation; Small Business Administration; Small business; Tax administration and collection, taxpayers

Congressional Bill

Ask GovernmentReporter about this bill

Ask anything about this bill. The AI can look up referenced laws and statutes to provide context.

HR 421: Small Business Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act | Legislation Reporter