HR 3234 · 119th Congress

Keeping Deposits Local Act

deposit insurancecommunity bankingbanking regulationreciprocal deposits
Share

Last action 2026-05-21

Sponsored by Rep. Emmer, Tom [R-MN-6] (R) — MN

Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.

Would expand the cap on reciprocal deposits — a tool banks use to spread large balances across a network of institutions to maximize federal deposit insurance — that insured depository institutions may hold without those funds being classified as brokered deposits, and would broaden which institutions may participate.

The change could help community and mid-sized banks retain large deposits from municipalities, businesses, and nonprofits that currently migrate to bigger institutions because local banks cannot offer full insurance coverage on balances above the standard FDIC limit.

What this bill would do

What it would do

The bill would amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to replace the existing flat cap on reciprocal deposits with a tiered system tied to each institution's total liabilities. Institutions could hold reciprocal deposits outside the brokered-deposit classification equal to 50% of liabilities up to $1 billion, plus 40% of liabilities between $1 billion and $10 billion, plus 30% of liabilities between $10 billion and $250 billion. It would also widen the eligibility criteria for participating institutions, allowing those with a CAMELS rating of 1, 2, or 3 — not only those rated "outstanding" or "good" — to accept such deposits.

The bill would also require the FDIC, in consultation with the Federal Reserve, to study reciprocal deposit performance since 2018 and report findings to Congress within six months of enactment. A separate provision would reduce the Federal Reserve's Discretionary Surplus Fund by $28 million, effective September 1, 2036, serving as a budget offset.

Key provisions

  1. 1Would replace the existing flat cap on reciprocal deposits with a tiered system: 50% of liabilities up to $1 billion, 40% for the next $9 billion, and 30% for liabilities between $10 billion and $250 billion.Sec. 2
  2. 2Would broaden eligibility for accepting reciprocal deposits to include institutions with a CAMELS rating of 1, 2, or 3, expanding beyond the current 'outstanding or good' standard.Sec. 3
  3. 3Would direct the FDIC, in consultation with the Federal Reserve, to study reciprocal deposit performance since 2018 — including usage during stress periods — and report to Congress within six months.Sec. 4
  4. 4Would reduce the Federal Reserve's Discretionary Surplus Fund by $28 million, effective September 1, 2036, as a budget offset.Sec. 5

Who would be affected

Insured depository institutions — particularly community banks and mid-sized banks — that participate in reciprocal deposit networks. Large depositors such as municipalities, nonprofit organizations, and businesses that seek FDIC insurance coverage on balances exceeding $250,000 would also be affected, as would the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board, which are directed to conduct the study.

Why it matters

For community and mid-sized banks, larger reciprocal deposit limits would allow them to compete more directly with large banks for big-balance customers who currently favor institutions perceived as "too big to fail." Institutions previously locked out at a CAMELS 3 rating would gain new access to these products, potentially broadening deposit bases and keeping large local deposits — from cities, charities, and businesses — closer to home.

What would change

Changes to existing law

Amends Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1831f(i) (Sec. 2)

Replaces the flat reciprocal deposit cap with a three-tier system based on percentages of total liabilities.

Amends Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1831f(i)(2)(A)(i) (Sec. 3)

Changes the qualifying CAMELS rating for institutions to accept reciprocal deposits from 'outstanding or good' to a rating of 1, 2, or 3.

Amends Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. 289(a)(3)(A) (Sec. 5)

Reduces the specified dollar amount in the Discretionary Surplus Fund provision by $28 million, effective September 1, 2036.

Agencies directed to act

Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationBoard of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Effective dates

  • Reduction of the Federal Reserve Discretionary Surplus Fund by $28 millionSec. 52036-09-01
  • FDIC report to Congress on reciprocal deposit studySec. 4(c)Within 6 months of enactment

Funding and costs

  • $28,000,000

    Reduction of the Federal Reserve Discretionary Surplus Fund, serving as a budget offsetSec. 5

How implementation would work

The bill's core changes to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act would be self-executing upon enactment, immediately altering how regulators classify reciprocal deposits for eligible institutions. The FDIC would need to update examination guidance to reflect the new CAMELS 3 eligibility threshold and the tiered liability-based limits. Separately, the FDIC must complete a comprehensive study of reciprocal deposit usage, risks, and benefits — drawing on quantitative and qualitative data — and deliver a written report to the House Financial Services and Senate Banking Committees within six months of enactment. The Federal Reserve surplus-fund reduction takes effect on a delayed date of September 1, 2036.

Legislative status & sources

Latest action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

2026-05-21

Official CRS summary

Show the CRS summary

This bill increases the amount insured depository institutions may accept as reciprocal deposits. (Reciprocal deposits are used by institutions to increase the availability of deposit insurance by splitting large deposits using a reciprocal network of institutions.) The bill creates a tiered system so that the allowable amount is based on the institution's total liabilities.

Additionally, the bill changes certain qualifications insured depository institutions may be required to have to accept reciprocal deposits. Under current law, institutions may qualify by having a composite rating of outstanding or good, among other requirements. The bill allows institutions with a 1, 2, or 3 rating under the CAMELS scale to qualify. (The Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System uses the characteristics of capital adequacy, asset quality, management, earnings, liquidity, and sensitivity to market risk (i.e., CAMELS ratings) to rate the health of financial institutions, with a 1 indicating the highest rating and least degree of supervisory concern and a 5 indicating the lowest rating and highest degree of supervisory concern.)

From the Congressional Research Service.

Legislative subjects

Bank accounts, deposits, capital; Banking and financial institutions regulation; Finance and Financial Sector

Committee report

H. Rept. 119-362

Congressional Bill

Ask GovernmentReporter about this bill

Ask anything about this bill. The AI can look up referenced laws and statutes to provide context.

HR 3234: Keeping Deposits Local Act | Legislation Reporter