BRAVE Burma Act
Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.
Would extend and expand U.S. sanctions law targeting Burma's military junta through 2032, require annual presidential determinations on whether key Burmese state enterprises and the jet fuel sector meet sanctions criteria, and direct the U.S. representative at the IMF to oppose increases to Burma's shareholding.
It would also require the President to appoint a Senate-confirmed Special Envoy for Burma to coordinate all U.S. policy toward the country — including sanctions, arms embargoes, and humanitarian assistance — following the 2021 military coup.
What this bill would do
What it would do
The bill would amend the Burma Unified through Rigorous Military Accountability Act of 2022, extending its sunset through December 23, 2032. It would require the President, within 180 days of enactment and annually for seven years, to determine whether the Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise, the Myanma Economic Bank, or foreign persons operating in Burma's jet fuel sector meet the criteria for mandatory sanctions under that law or under Executive Order 14014, which blocks property related to the situation in Burma. The President would have to report those determinations to Congress in unclassified form, with a classified annex permitted.
Separately, the bill would direct the Secretary of the Treasury to instruct the U.S. Executive Director at the International Monetary Fund to use the U.S. voice and vote to limit any increase to Burma's IMF shareholding while the State Administrative Council — the junta that seized power in the 2021 coup — remains in control. The President could waive that requirement by certifying to Congress that it is important to the national interest. The bill would also require the President to appoint a Special Envoy for Burma, subject to Senate confirmation, at ambassadorial rank.
Key provisions
- 1Would extend the Burma sanctions law sunset through December 23, 2032, continuing presidential authority to impose sanctions on Burmese officials, state enterprises, and other persons.
- 2Would require the President to determine annually for seven years whether Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise, Myanma Economic Bank, and foreign persons in Burma's jet fuel sector meet sanctions criteria under current law or Executive Order 14014.
- 3Would require the President to report each annual sanctions determination to appropriate congressional committees in unclassified form, with a classified annex permitted.
- 4Would direct the U.S. Executive Director at the IMF to vote to limit any increase in Burma's IMF shareholding while the State Administrative Council remains in power.
- 5Would allow the President to waive the IMF shareholding instruction by certifying national-interest grounds to the House Financial Services and Senate Foreign Relations committees.
- 6Would require the President to appoint a Senate-confirmed Special Envoy for Burma at ambassadorial rank to coordinate all aspects of U.S. Burma policy.
Who would be affected
The Burmese military junta and the state-owned enterprises it controls, including the Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise and Myanma Economic Bank. Foreign companies and financial institutions operating in Burma's jet fuel sector — including importers, exporters, transporters, and financial service providers — would face annual scrutiny for sanctions eligibility. The U.S. Executive Director at the IMF would receive new voting instructions. A new Special Envoy position would be created within the executive branch.
Why it matters
If enacted, the bill would lock in sustained U.S. sanctions pressure on Burma's military government through the end of the decade, closing off a potential post-2025 lapse in the underlying law. The jet-fuel sector focus targets a key revenue stream for military operations. The IMF shareholding provision would limit the junta's access to multilateral financial standing, and the Special Envoy would give U.S. Burma policy a dedicated senior diplomat to coordinate it.
What would change
Changes to existing law
Amends Burma Unified through Rigorous Military Accountability Act of 2022 (22 U.S.C. 10222) (Sec. 2)
Extends the law's sunset through December 23, 2032 and rewrites the sanctions assessment provision to add annual mandatory determinations on specific Burmese enterprises and the jet fuel sector.
Amends James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, Section 5571(e) (Sec. 2)
Replaces existing reporting language with a new seven-year annual determination requirement covering named Burmese state enterprises and the jet fuel sector.
Agencies directed to act
Effective dates
- First annual presidential sanctions determination due
Funding and costs
Congressional Budget Office estimate
CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 3190 (the BRAVE Burma Act) would reduce deficits by less than $500,000 over the 2026–2035 period, with all direct spending and revenue effects also below $500,000.
CBO finds that H.R. 3190 would have insignificant effects on both revenues and direct spending (mandatory spending not controlled by annual appropriations) over the 2026–2035 period, resulting in a net deficit reduction of less than $500,000. Any additional sanctions triggered by the bill's required annual determinations would affect only a small number of people, producing minor changes in visa-fee revenues and modest reductions in federal benefits spending. Discretionary costs for the reporting and diplomatic advocacy required by the bill are estimated at less than $500,000 over 2026–2030, subject to appropriated funds being available. CBO identified no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates in the bill.
How implementation would work
The President must make the first sanctions determination within 180 days of enactment and repeat it annually for seven years, submitting unclassified reports (with optional classified annexes) to the appropriate congressional committees each cycle. The Secretary of the Treasury would issue standing instructions to the U.S. IMF Executive Director to vote against Burma shareholding increases for as long as the junta governs; the President can waive that requirement by certifying national-interest grounds to the House Financial Services and Senate Foreign Relations committees. The Special Envoy, confirmed by the Senate, would serve at ambassadorial rank and coordinate sanctions, arms embargoes, and assistance policy across agencies.
Legislative status & sources
Latest action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Official CRS summary
Show the CRS summaryHide the CRS summary
This bill extends and expands a law imposing sanctions on Burma. The bill also requires the President to appoint a Special Envoy for Burma.
Current law authorizes, and in some cases requires, the President to impose sanctions on certain Burmese state-owned enterprises, Burmese officials and family members, and other foreign persons. The bill extends this law through December 23, 2032. The bill also requires the President to annually determine, for the next seven years, whether the Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise, the Myanma Economic Bank, or foreign persons operating in Burma's jet fuel sector meet the criteria for required sanctions under (1) the previously mentioned law; or (2) Executive Order 14014, Blocking Property With Respect to the Situation in Burma.
The U.S. Executive Director at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) must advocate and vote to limit any increase to Burma's IMF shareholding while Burma's State Administrative Council is in power. (The State Administrative Council is the junta installed after Burma's 2021 military coup.)
The President must appoint a Special Envoy for Burma with the advice and consent of the Senate. The envoy shall have the rank and status of ambassador and be responsible for coordinating all aspects of U.S. policy regarding Burma, including sanctions, arms embargoes, and assistance to the people of Burma.
Legislative subjects
ASEAN countries; Asia; Bangladesh; Burma; Congressional oversight; Diplomacy, foreign officials, Americans abroad; Federal officials; Foreign and international banking; India; International Affairs
Committee report
H. Rept. 119-321