Save SBA from Sanctuary Cities Act of 2025
Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.
The bill would require the Small Business Administration to relocate any regional, district, or local office located in a 'sanctuary jurisdiction' — a locality that restricts sharing immigration status information or compliance with federal immigration detainer requests — within 120 days of a public determination, and would prohibit the SBA from opening new offices in such jurisdictions.
If an office misses the 120-day relocation deadline, it would be forced to cease operations and its head would face mandatory removal, linking federal small business services directly to local immigration enforcement cooperation for the first time.
What this bill would do
What it would do
The bill would require the SBA Administrator to publicly identify any SBA regional, district, or local office located in a sanctuary jurisdiction, then relocate that office within 120 days to a location that is not a sanctuary jurisdiction. A sanctuary jurisdiction is defined as a political subdivision of a state — a city, county, or similar locality — that has a law, ordinance, policy, or practice restricting the sharing of immigration status information with other government entities or blocking compliance with DHS detainer requests under Sections 236 or 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
If an office is not relocated within the 120-day window, it would cease operations and its employees would be reassigned to other SBA offices that are not in sanctuary jurisdictions. The office head would be required to submit a written explanation; the Administrator would be mandated to remove that official if the explanation is not provided or is deemed insufficient. The bill would also prohibit the SBA from establishing any new covered offices in a sanctuary jurisdiction. It would not apply to SBA headquarters, and the definition of sanctuary jurisdiction covers only political subdivisions — not states themselves.
Key provisions
- 1Would require the SBA Administrator to relocate each covered regional, district, or local office found to be in a sanctuary jurisdiction, after making that determination publicly available.
- 2Would set a 120-day deadline for completing office relocation after the Administrator publicly posts a sanctuary-jurisdiction determination for that office.
- 3Would require a non-relocated office to cease operations past the 120-day deadline, with employees reassigned to non-sanctuary SBA offices in the same state if available.
- 4Would mandate the Administrator to remove the head of any office that fails to relocate on time if no written explanation is submitted within 5 days or the explanation is deemed insufficient.
- 5Would prohibit the SBA from establishing any new regional, district, or local office in a sanctuary jurisdiction.
- 6Defines sanctuary jurisdiction as a political subdivision of a state that restricts immigration-status information sharing or compliance with DHS detainer requests under INA Sections 236 or 287.
Who would be affected
SBA employees working in regional, district, or local offices situated in cities or counties with sanctuary policies; small business owners, loan applicants, and entrepreneurs in those localities who rely on in-person SBA services; local governments whose immigration policies would trigger a relocation determination; and SBA office heads who face mandatory removal for failing to meet the 120-day deadline.
Why it matters
SBA field offices provide direct access to small business loans, counseling, and federal contracting assistance. Businesses in major cities with sanctuary policies could lose nearby SBA office access if relocation or closure is triggered. Office-level officials face an unusually severe personal consequence — mandatory removal — for missing a tight administrative deadline, setting a new precedent for enforcing immigration-related compliance within a domestic economic agency.
What would change
Agencies directed to act
Effective dates
- 120-day deadline for office relocation, triggered by the Administrator's public determination
- Prohibition on establishing new SBA offices in sanctuary jurisdictions
How implementation would work
The SBA Administrator would first make and publicly post a determination that a specific covered office is in a sanctuary jurisdiction. The 120-day relocation clock then begins. If the deadline is missed, the office must immediately cease operations and employees must be reassigned; the office head has 5 days to submit a written explanation, and the Administrator must remove the head if the explanation is absent or insufficient. The bill provides no rulemaking requirement or specific process for how the Administrator identifies sanctuary jurisdictions; that determination appears to rest with the Administrator's discretion. The prohibition on new office openings is self-executing upon enactment.
Legislative status & sources
Latest action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Official CRS summary
Show the CRS summaryHide the CRS summary
This bill requires the relocation of a regional, district, or local office of the Small Business Administration (SBA) if the SBA makes a public determination that the office is located in a sanctuary jurisdiction. The SBA must relocate that office, within 60 days of such determination, to a location that is not a sanctuary jurisdiction.
Under the bill, a sanctuary jurisdiction is a state or political subdivision thereof that prohibits or restricts any government entity or official from (1) exchanging with another government entity information regarding the citizenship or immigration status of an individual; or (2) complying with specified requests by the Department of Homeland Security.
Additionally, the SBA may not establish an office in a sanctuary jurisdiction.
Legislative subjects
Administrative remedies; Border security and unlawful immigration; Commerce; Immigration status and procedures; Intergovernmental relations; Small Business Administration; State and local government operations
Committee report
H. Rept. 119-110