STABLE Act of 2025
Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.
Would establish the first comprehensive federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins — dollar-pegged digital tokens used for payments — limiting issuance to federally or state-approved entities required to hold dollar-for-dollar liquid reserves and comply with anti-money-laundering rules.
The bill would also amend five major securities laws to confirm that regulated payment stablecoins are not securities, impose a two-year moratorium on new algorithmic stablecoins, and set uniform customer-asset segregation rules for stablecoin custodians — marking a significant step toward integrating digital-dollar instruments into the supervised financial system.
What this bill would do
What it would do
The bill would create a licensing and oversight regime for payment stablecoins — digital assets pegged to a fixed monetary value and designed for use in payments or settlement. Only "permitted payment stablecoin issuers" could issue such instruments in the United States. Permitted issuers must be either a subsidiary of an insured depository institution, a federally approved nonbank entity overseen by the Comptroller of the Currency, or a state-licensed entity operating under a regime the Treasury has certified as meeting federal standards. Every permitted issuer would be required to hold at least one dollar of liquid reserves — U.S. currency, short-term Treasury securities, or qualifying money market funds — for every stablecoin outstanding, publicly disclose its redemption policy, and publish monthly reserve reports certified by its CEO and CFO and reviewed by an independent auditor. Permitted issuers could not pay interest or yield to stablecoin holders.
The bill would place a two-year moratorium on issuing new algorithmic stablecoins (those whose value is backed by a related digital asset rather than hard reserves), require stablecoin issuers to comply with Bank Secrecy Act anti-money-laundering obligations, and amend five federal securities laws to establish that regulated payment stablecoins are not securities. Custodians holding stablecoins or reserve assets on behalf of customers would have to segregate those assets from the custodian's own property, and stablecoin holders would have priority claims against reserves in any insolvency.
Key provisions
- 1Would prohibit anyone other than a permitted payment stablecoin issuer from issuing a payment stablecoin in the US; custodial intermediaries must comply within 18 months of enactment.
- 2Would require permitted issuers to maintain one-to-one reserves in U.S. currency, short-term Treasuries, or qualifying money market funds, with no pledging or rehypothecation of those reserves.
- 3Would require monthly reserve reports certified by the CEO and CFO and audited by an independent registered accounting firm; false certifications carry criminal penalties up to 20 years imprisonment.
- 4Would treat permitted stablecoin issuers as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act, requiring anti-money-laundering programs, suspicious-activity reporting, and customer identification procedures.
- 5Would require custodians of stablecoins and reserves to segregate customer assets from the custodian's own property, and would give stablecoin holders priority claims against reserves in insolvency.
- 6Would impose a two-year moratorium on issuing new endogenously collateralized (algorithmic) stablecoins — those backed solely by a related digital asset from the same originator.
- 7Would amend the Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Investment Advisers Act, Investment Company Act, and SIPA to exclude regulated payment stablecoins from the definition of 'security.'
Who would be affected
Technology companies, fintech firms, banks, and credit unions that seek to issue or custody payment stablecoins; consumers and businesses using stablecoins for payments or remittances; existing stablecoin issuers that must obtain approval before custodial intermediaries may continue offering their tokens after 18 months; state financial regulators seeking Treasury certification of their oversight regimes; and federal banking regulators assigned new joint supervisory and rulemaking duties.
Why it matters
The bill would determine the legal and operational landscape for a large and rapidly growing stablecoin market. Issuers without approval would face civil penalties of up to $100,000 per day, and senior officers who falsify monthly reserve certifications could face up to 20 years in prison. The securities-law exclusions would resolve longstanding uncertainty over whether stablecoin transactions trigger SEC oversight, affecting how the entire digital-asset industry is structured.
What would change
Changes to existing law
Amends Securities Act of 1933 (Sec. 15(c))
Adds an exclusion from the statutory definition of 'security' for payment stablecoins issued by a permitted payment stablecoin issuer.
Amends Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Sec. 15(d))
Adds an exclusion from the statutory definition of 'security' for payment stablecoins issued by a permitted payment stablecoin issuer.
Amends Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Sec. 15(a))
Adds an exclusion from the definition of 'security' for payment stablecoins issued by a permitted payment stablecoin issuer.
Amends Investment Company Act of 1940 (Sec. 15(b))
Excludes payment stablecoins from the 'security' definition and exempts permitted payment stablecoin issuers from classification as investment companies.
Amends Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (Sec. 15(e))
Adds an exclusion from the 'security' definition for payment stablecoins issued by a permitted payment stablecoin issuer.
Amends Financial Stability Act of 2010 (Sec. 4(a)(5)(C))
Exempts capital requirements for permitted stablecoin issuers from section 171's leverage and risk-based capital standards; bank holding companies need not hold excess capital against stablecoin subsidiaries.
Amends Bank Secrecy Act (Sec. 4(a)(6))
Extends Bank Secrecy Act obligations to permitted stablecoin issuers as financial institutions, with FinCEN directed to issue tailored anti-money-laundering regulations.
Agencies directed to act
Effective dates
- Prohibition on custodial intermediaries offering stablecoins from non-permitted issuers
- Primary federal regulators must issue issuer-requirement regulations
- Application approval process for nonbank and depository subsidiaries takes effect
- Two-year moratorium on new endogenously collateralized (algorithmic) stablecoins
- Treasury reports on non-payment stablecoins and on stablecoin economic impact due to Congress
- Rulemaking status report from federal regulators to Congress
How implementation would work
Federal banking regulators — the Fed, OCC, FDIC, and NCUA — would jointly issue capital, liquidity, cybersecurity, and reserve-management regulations within 180 days of enactment. The OCC would process nonbank issuer applications within a 120-day window, with applications deemed approved if the agency fails to act. FinCEN would issue tailored Bank Secrecy Act rules. States may self-certify their regimes to Treasury; rejections can be appealed to the D.C. Circuit. Permitted issuers submit monthly reserve reports independently audited by a registered public accounting firm and certified by their top two officers. Congress would receive a rulemaking status report within six months and two Treasury policy studies — on non-payment stablecoins and on stablecoin economic impact — within one year.
Legislative status & sources
Latest action
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 68.
Official CRS summary
Show the CRS summaryHide the CRS summary
This bill establishes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins (digital assets which an issuer must redeem for a fixed value).
Under the bill, only permitted issuers may issue a payment stablecoin in the United States, subject to certain exceptions. Permitted issuers must be a subsidiary of an insured depository institution, a federal-qualified nonbank payment stablecoin issuer, or a state-qualified payment stablecoin issuer. Permitted issuers must be regulated by the appropriate federal or state regulator. A state regulator must certify that the state regulatory regime meets or exceeds federal requirements as established by the bill.
Permitted issuers must maintain reserves backing the stablecoin on a one-to-one basis using U.S. currency or other similarly liquid assets, as specified. Permitted issuers must also publicly disclose their redemption policy and publish monthly the details of their reserves.
The bill specifies requirements for (1) reusing reserves; (2) providing safekeeping services for stablecoins; and (3) supervisory, examination, and enforcement authority over federal-qualified issuers.
The bill places a two-year moratorium on new endogenously collateralized stablecoins (i.e., stablecoins that rely on the value of another digital asset created or maintained by the same originator to maintain the fixed price).
Under the bill, permitted payment stablecoins are not considered securities under securities law. However, permitted issuers are subject to the Bank Secrecy Act for anti-money laundering and related purposes.
Legislative subjects
Bank accounts, deposits, capital; Banking and financial institutions regulation; Civil actions and liability; Computer security and identity theft; Computers and information technology; Congressional oversight; Consumer affairs; Currency; Digital media; Finance and Financial Sector; Financial services and investments; Fraud offenses and financial crimes; Government studies and investigations; Judicial procedure and administration; Securities; State and local government operations
Committee report
H. Rept. 119-94