Access to Small Business Investor Capital Act
Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.
Would allow registered investment companies — such as mutual funds — to omit from a required fee disclosure the costs they incur indirectly by investing in business development companies, which are specialized vehicles that channel capital into small and mid-sized businesses.
The change targets a disclosure rule that currently makes funds investing in business development companies appear more expensive than comparable funds, a dynamic critics say discourages those investments and limits capital access for small businesses.
What this bill would do
What it would do
The bill would permit a registered investment company to omit, from the "Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses" (AFFE) line item on its SEC registration statement, any fees and expenses incurred indirectly through investment in a business development company (BDC). AFFE is a required sub-caption in the fee table that registered funds must file with the Securities and Exchange Commission; it discloses the operating costs a fund bears through its investments in other funds. Under current SEC form requirements, BDC-related fees must be included in this calculation.
The bill would not eliminate the AFFE disclosure line item itself, nor change any other disclosure requirement. It creates a narrow statutory permission for funds to exclude BDC-related costs specifically, leaving all other aspects of the fee table intact. The bill defines key terms by reference to existing SEC registration forms (N-1A, N-2, and N-3) and their successors.
Key provisions
- 1Would permit a registered investment company to omit, from the AFFE fee-table calculation on its SEC registration statement, fees and expenses incurred indirectly through investment in one or more business development companies.
- 2Would define key terms — including Acquired Fund, AFFE, business development company, and Fee Table Disclosure — by reference to existing SEC registration forms N-1A, N-2, and N-3 and their successors.
Who would be affected
Registered investment companies — including open-end mutual funds, closed-end funds, and variable annuity separate accounts — that currently invest in or are considering investing in business development companies. BDCs themselves would be indirectly affected, as would the small and mid-sized businesses that rely on BDCs for growth capital. Retail investors reading fund fee tables would see a reduced AFFE figure for funds holding BDCs.
Why it matters
Because AFFE currently must include BDC-related costs, funds that invest in BDCs can show a higher apparent expense ratio than peers that avoid them — potentially discouraging fund managers from allocating to BDCs at all. If this exclusion were enacted, fund managers would face less fee-table pressure when investing in BDCs, which could increase the flow of institutional capital into BDCs and, through them, into small businesses seeking financing.
What would change
Changes to existing law
Creates Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. 80a-8(b) (Sec. 2(b))
Adds a new freestanding statutory permission allowing registered investment companies to omit BDC-related fees from AFFE calculations when filing registration statements under this section.
Agencies directed to act
How implementation would work
The bill would be largely self-executing: once enacted, any registered investment company could immediately omit BDC-related fees from its AFFE calculation on new or amended registration statement filings. No agency rulemaking is required to activate the permission. The SEC, which administers Forms N-1A, N-2, and N-3, may update its form instructions or guidance to reflect the statutory change, and the bill explicitly extends the permission to any successor fee-table disclosure the SEC later adopts. There are no reporting mandates, grant cycles, or phase-ins.
Legislative status & sources
Latest action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Official CRS summary
Show the CRS summaryHide the CRS summary
This bill allows a registered investment company to exclude from the calculation of acquired fund fees and expenses those incurred indirectly from investment in a business development company. Acquired fund fees and expenses is a required line item on a fund's fee schedule that provides the operating expenses of the fund.
Legislative subjects
Business investment and capital; Finance and Financial Sector; Financial services and investments; User charges and fees
Committee report
H. Rept. 119-126