Generative AI Terrorism Risk Assessment Act
Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.
Would require the Department of Homeland Security to conduct annual threat assessments for five years on how generative artificial intelligence — AI that creates synthetic images, video, audio, or text — is being used for terrorism, and to share that intelligence across federal agencies and state fusion centers.
The bill responds to concerns that foreign terrorist organizations are exploiting AI tools for radicalization, recruitment, and potentially weapons development in ways the government does not yet fully understand.
What this bill would do
What it would do
The bill would require the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, to submit annual terrorism threat assessments to Congress for five years. Each assessment would have to analyze incidents in which foreign terrorist organizations or individuals used, or attempted to use, generative AI to spread violent extremist messaging, recruit individuals to violence, or enhance their ability to develop or deploy chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapons. Each assessment would also include recommendations to counter these threats. The unclassified portion of each assessment would have to be posted publicly on the DHS website, with a classified annex permitted.
The bill would also establish information-sharing requirements: DHS would be directed to review generative AI–related threat information gathered by state and major urban area fusion centers and incorporate it into DHS's own holdings, then disseminate relevant information back to those centers. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the FBI, and other intelligence community members would be required to share relevant information with DHS. A congressional briefing would be due within 30 days of each annual assessment.
Key provisions
- 1Would require DHS to submit annual terrorism threat assessments to Congress on generative AI misuse, for five years beginning within one year of enactment.
- 2Would require each assessment to analyze incidents where foreign terrorist organizations used generative AI to spread extremist messaging, recruit for violence, or advance CBRN weapons development.
- 3Would require each assessment to include recommendations to counter generative AI–enabled terrorism threats.
- 4Would require the unclassified portion of each assessment to be posted publicly on the DHS website; a classified annex is permitted.
- 5Would require DHS to brief relevant congressional committees within 30 days of each annual assessment submission.
- 6Would require ODNI, FBI, and intelligence community members to share generative AI terrorism threat information with DHS, and would require DHS to exchange such information with fusion centers.
Who would be affected
The Department of Homeland Security, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the FBI, and broader intelligence community members — all of whom would face new reporting or sharing obligations. State and major urban area fusion centers would receive and contribute threat information. Congressional homeland security, intelligence, and commerce committees would receive annual briefings and written assessments.
Why it matters
If enacted, DHS would be required to systematically track and report how terrorist actors exploit generative AI tools — a threat category with no existing dedicated assessment framework. Fusion centers nationwide would gain access to consolidated federal intelligence on this threat, and Congress would receive regular, public-facing analysis to inform oversight and potential countermeasures.
What would change
Agencies directed to act
Effective dates
- First annual terrorism threat assessment due to Congress
- Congressional briefing due after each annual assessment
Funding and costs
Congressional Budget Office estimate
CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 1736 would cost less than $500,000 over the 2026–2030 period, with no effect on direct spending, revenues, or the deficit.
CBO estimates that H.R. 1736 would have no effect on direct (mandatory) spending, revenues, or the deficit over the 2026–2035 period. The only projected cost — less than $500,000 over 2026–2030 — would come from the bill's annual reporting requirements and is subject to the availability of discretionary appropriations (funds Congress must separately approve each year). CBO expects costs related to the bill's requirement that the Department of Homeland Security review and disseminate fusion-center intelligence on generative AI terrorism threats to be insignificant, since DHS already performs those activities. CBO identified no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates in the bill.
How implementation would work
DHS would have one year from enactment to deliver the first assessment and would repeat the process annually for five years. Each assessment must be coordinated to protect privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties. The Secretary would brief the relevant congressional committees within 30 days of each submission, with heads of other relevant agencies joining if the committees request it. DHS would also run a parallel information-sharing loop with fusion centers — collecting threat data from them and disseminating consolidated intelligence back. No rulemaking requirement is specified; the obligations are self-executing statutory mandates.
Legislative status & sources
Latest action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Official CRS summary
Show the CRS summaryHide the CRS summary
This bill requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to periodically provide Congress with an assessment of threats to the United States posed by the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) for terrorism. Generative AI is defined as the class of AI models that emulate the structure and characteristics of input data to generate derived synthetic content, including images, videos, audio, text, and other digital content.
The bill also (1) requires DHS to review and disseminate related information gathered by state and major urban area fusion centers and the National Network of Fusion Centers, and (2) requires other federal agencies to share related information with DHS. (A fusion center is a collaborative effort of two or more federal, state, local, or tribal government agencies that combines resources, expertise, or information with the goal of maximizing the ability of such agencies to detect, prevent, investigate, apprehend, and respond to criminal or terrorist activity.)
Legislative subjects
Advanced technology and technological innovations; Armed Forces and National Security; Congressional oversight; Government information and archives; Terrorism
Committee report
H. Rept. 119-373