DETERRENT Act
Click any stage to learn more about the legislative process.
The DETERRENT Act would significantly tighten federal rules on foreign money flowing to U.S. colleges and universities — lowering the disclosure threshold for gifts and contracts from non-adversary foreign sources, banning contracts with foreign adversaries without a government waiver, and requiring faculty at major research universities to disclose their own foreign financial relationships.
The bill would also require private universities with very large endowments to report investments in foreign adversary entities, and it would create an escalating penalty regime — up to loss of federal student aid eligibility — for institutions that repeatedly violate the rules.
What this bill would do
What it would do
The bill would amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to overhaul foreign-gift and foreign-contract disclosure requirements for colleges and universities. It would lower the reporting threshold for gifts and contracts from non-adversary foreign sources from $250,000 to $50,000, and require disclosure of any gift from a foreign country of concern (such as China or Russia) or foreign entity of concern regardless of dollar amount. It would prohibit institutions from entering contracts with foreign adversaries without a one-year, renewable waiver from the Department of Education — a waiver that can only be issued after consultation with national security agencies. It would require certain large research universities and Title VI institutions to maintain policies under which faculty and researchers disclose their own foreign financial relationships, and mandate that private universities with more than $6 billion in non-exempt assets and more than $250 million in adversary-linked investments file annual investment disclosure reports.
The bill would not apply to arms-length purchases of goods or services from non-adversary foreign sources, standard student financial-aid payments for fewer than 16 students, or routine intellectual property licenses unrelated to controlled technologies. Enforcement would be handled through Department of Education investigations and civil actions brought by the Attorney General, with penalties scaled to the severity and recurrence of violations, up to and including loss of eligibility to participate in federal student financial aid programs.
Key provisions
- 1Would lower the disclosure threshold for gifts and contracts from non-adversary foreign sources to $50,000 (from $250,000), and require disclosure of any gift from a foreign country or entity of concern regardless of value.
- 2Would prohibit institutions from entering contracts with foreign countries or entities of concern without a one-year waiver from the Secretary of Education, issued only after national security consultation.
- 3Would require certain research universities and Title VI institutions to maintain policies under which faculty and researchers disclose foreign gifts above minimal value and foreign contracts worth $5,000 or more.
- 4Would require private institutions with more than $6 billion in non-exempt assets and more than $250 million in adversary-linked investments to file annual investment disclosure reports with the Secretary.
- 5Would require the Department of Education to investigate violations and direct the Attorney General to seek civil penalties, including fines tied to the value of unreported gifts and a share of federal funding received.
- 6Would make institutions with three civil judgments and a waiver prohibition ineligible for federal student financial aid for at least two fiscal years, with a two-year compliance demonstration required to regain eligibility.
- 7Would require the Department of Education to share all foreign-gift disclosure reports with the FBI, CIA, Director of National Intelligence, and other national security agencies within 30 days of receipt.
Who would be affected
All institutions of higher education that participate in federal student financial aid programs would face new disclosure requirements. Faculty and researchers (covered individuals) at universities receiving more than $50 million in federal research funding or receiving Title VI funds would need to individually disclose foreign financial relationships. Private universities with endowments exceeding $6 billion in non-exempt assets and more than $250 million in adversary-linked investments would face additional investment reporting requirements.
Why it matters
Universities that accept gifts or enter contracts from foreign adversaries without proper disclosure or waiver could face fines equal to or greater than the value of the undisclosed gifts, a percentage of their total federal funding, and ultimately loss of federal student aid eligibility. Faculty who fail to disclose foreign contracts through institutional channels could expose their universities to substantial enforcement liability. The waiver prohibition for repeat offenders cuts off a key compliance pathway.
What would change
Changes to existing law
Amends Higher Education Act of 1965, Section 117 (20 U.S.C. 1011f) (Sec. 2)
Replaces existing foreign-gift disclosure rules with stricter thresholds, broader coverage of adversary-country gifts, and new public database and interagency-sharing requirements.
Creates Higher Education Act of 1965, Part B of Title I (Sec. 2–5)
Adds new Sections 117A (contract prohibition and waiver), 117B (individual researcher disclosure policy), 117C (investment disclosure), and 117D (enforcement and compliance officers).
Amends Higher Education Act of 1965, Section 487(a) (20 U.S.C. 1094) (Sec. 5)
Adds compliance with new foreign-gift and contract sections to program participation agreements, enabling loss of federal student aid eligibility for repeat violators.
Agencies directed to act
Effective dates
- Institutions with existing contracts with foreign adversaries must submit waiver requests
- Department of Education must share previously filed disclosure reports with national security agencies
- Qualifying institutions must establish researcher disclosure policies and databases under Sec. 117B
- Department of Education must establish the public foreign-gift disclosure database
- GAO must initiate the interagency coordination study
- GAO must submit its report to Congress
Funding and costs
Congressional Budget Office estimate
CBO estimates H.R. 1048, the DETERRENT Act, would have no significant effect on the federal deficit, with changes to direct spending, revenues, and discretionary spending all falling between -$500,000 and $500,000 over the 2025–2035 period.
CBO estimates that any increases in revenues from fines or civil penalties — and any decreases in direct spending on federal student aid — resulting from the bill would be insignificant over the 2025–2035 period, as CBO expects institutions would generally comply with the new foreign-gift and contract disclosure requirements. Discretionary implementation costs for the Department of Education are estimated at less than $500,000 over the 2025–2030 period, subject to appropriations. The bill imposes both intergovernmental and private-sector mandates — including new reporting requirements and a prohibition on contracts with foreign entities of concern — but CBO cannot determine the costs of those mandates because the number of affected institutions and the value of contracts that might be terminated are unknown.
How implementation would work
The Department of Education's General Counsel would investigate potential violations; confirmed knowing or willful violations would trigger a referral to the Attorney General, who would bring a civil action in federal district court. Convicted institutions must reimburse the government's full enforcement costs plus escalating fines. Institutions receiving three civil judgments and losing waiver eligibility would become ineligible for federal student aid for at least two fiscal years and must demonstrate clean compliance for two further years to regain eligibility. ED must establish a publicly searchable disclosure database by May 31 of the year following enactment and share all disclosure reports with the FBI, CIA, DNI, and other national security agencies within 30 days of receipt. ED must also designate a single compliance point-of-contact, publish a list of foreign countries and entities of concern, and provide Congress and investigated institutions with status updates every 90 days.
Legislative status & sources
Latest action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Official CRS summary
Show the CRS summaryHide the CRS summary
This bill expands oversight and disclosure requirements related to foreign sources and institutions of higher education (IHEs).
Specifically, the bill requires an IHE to annually disclose to the Department of Education (ED) any year in which the IHE
- receives a gift from a foreign country of concern (e.g., China or Russia) or foreign entity of concern of any dollar amount;
- receives a gift or contract from a foreign source (other than a foreign country of concern or foreign entity of concern) that is valued at $50,000 or more, considered alone or in combination with all other gifts or contracts within a calendar year (current disclosure threshold is $250,000 or more), or which has an undetermined monetary value;
- enters into a contract with a foreign country of concern or foreign entity of concern after receiving a waiver for such contract; or
- is substantially controlled by a foreign source.
Additionally, the bill
- prohibits IHEs from entering into contracts with a foreign country of concern or with a foreign entity of concern without obtaining a waiver,
- requires certain IHEs to disclose gifts or contracts between covered individuals (e.g., researchers) and foreign sources, and
- requires private IHEs with specified assets or investments to file annual investment disclosure reports.
The bill requires ED to investigate possible violations of this bill and outlines the various penalties for each violation. Penalties may include losing eligibility for federal student financial aid.
Legislative subjects
Civil actions and liability; Congressional oversight; Contracts and agency; Education; Education programs funding; Financial services and investments; Government information and archives; Government studies and investigations; Higher education; Subversive activities; Teaching, teachers, curricula
Committee report
H. Rept. 119-16